BOOM

Trending Searches

    SUPPORT
    BOOM

    Trending News

      • Fact Check 
        • Fast Check
        • Politics
        • Business
        • Entertainment
        • Social
        • Sports
        • World
      • Law
      • Explainers
      • News 
        • All News
      • Decode 
        • Impact
        • Scamcheck
        • Life
        • Voices
      • Media Buddhi 
        • Digital Buddhi
        • Senior Citizens
        • Videos
      • Web Stories
      • BOOM Research
      • BOOM Labs
      • Deepfake Tracker
      • Videos 
        • Facts Neeti
      • Home-icon
        Home
      • About Us-icon
        About Us
      • Authors-icon
        Authors
      • Team-icon
        Team
      • Careers-icon
        Careers
      • Internship-icon
        Internship
      • Contact Us-icon
        Contact Us
      • Methodology-icon
        Methodology
      • Correction Policy-icon
        Correction Policy
      • Non-Partnership Policy-icon
        Non-Partnership Policy
      • Cookie Policy-icon
        Cookie Policy
      • Grievance Redressal-icon
        Grievance Redressal
      • Republishing Guidelines-icon
        Republishing Guidelines
      • Fact Check-icon
        Fact Check
        Fast Check
        Politics
        Business
        Entertainment
        Social
        Sports
        World
      • Law-icon
        Law
      • Explainers-icon
        Explainers
      • News-icon
        News
        All News
      • Decode-icon
        Decode
        Impact
        Scamcheck
        Life
        Voices
      • Media Buddhi-icon
        Media Buddhi
        Digital Buddhi
        Senior Citizens
        Videos
      • Web Stories-icon
        Web Stories
      • BOOM Research-icon
        BOOM Research
      • BOOM Labs-icon
        BOOM Labs
      • Deepfake Tracker-icon
        Deepfake Tracker
      • Videos-icon
        Videos
        Facts Neeti
      Trending Tags
      TRENDING
      • #Operation Sindoor
      • #Pahalgam Terror Attack
      • #Narendra Modi
      • #Rahul Gandhi
      • #Waqf Amendment Bill
      • #Arvind Kejriwal
      • #Deepfake
      • #Artificial Intelligence
      • Home
      • Law
      • India’s Copyright Laws Under...
      Law

      India’s Copyright Laws Under Spotlight: ANI vs Mohak Mangal

      YouTuber Mohak Mangal's battle with news agency ANI over copyright strikes has sparked a debate on the adequacy of India's fair use laws in the digital age.

      By -  Ritika Jain
      Published -  3 Jun 2025 3:24 PM IST
    • Boomlive
      Listen to this Article
      India’s Copyright Laws Under Spotlight: ANI vs Mohak Mangal

      Copyright Laws of India: ANI vs Mohak Mangal

      • ANI's copyright strikes on Mohak Mangal have sparked a major debate on fair use in India.
      • The legal battle highlights the inadequacies of India's current copyright laws in the digital age.
      • Experts call for clearer guidelines to protect content creators while respecting copyright holders.

      A copyright notice by news agency Asian News International (ANI) to YouTuber Mohak Mangal has snowballed into a wider debate on India’s digital content right, what qualifies as fair use and copyright laws.

      At the heart of the controversy is a common practice - use of short clips published by news agencies in videos made by digital creators. A practice being increasingly challenged by rights holders, in this case the news agency ANI.

      What Triggered The Fight?

      In late May 2025, Mangal uploaded a video, Dear ANI, amassing 5.8 million views. In the video, Mangal alleged ANI that issued multiple copyright strikes on his channel against short (9–11 second) snippets of news footage in his videos where he analyses and comment on current topics.

      Mangal said his videos on the RG Kar rape case and on Operation Sindoor received strikes, with ANI demanding a payment of ₹48 lakh to license the channel’s footage — or risk termination of his YouTube channel.

      Mangal in his video, used strong language against ANI, accusing them of “hafta vasooli” (extortion) and practicising “gunda raj” (mob rule). In response, ANI filed a defamation suit against Mangal, where the Delhi High Court ordered the digital creator to edit his video to remove certain remarks. Mangal has since made the video private, stating that a revised version will soon be uploaded to his channel

      While the two indulge in a legal back and forth, the issue has caused ripples in the creator ecosystem on what constitutes “fair use” under Indian copyright laws.

      The Grey Zone - Fair Use Of Digital Content

      The ANI vs Mohak Mangal highlights the outdated nature of the Copyright Act of 1957 and its struggles to gain a foothold with digital content.

      Section 52 of the Copyright Act talks about “fair dealing”, allowing use of copyrighted content for specific purposes including criticism, reporting, research and education, importantly without prior permission.

      But it has a catch – the law does not specify how much content can be used and whether any conditions apply to it. In addition, India’s fair dealing clause is limited in nature compared to the “fair use” doctrine followed by the US, a difference witnessed in how platforms like YouTube automatically act on copyright strikes, oftentimes sans review of the context.

      This is disadvantageous to digital content creators, especially if the purpose of their video may qualify under fair usage.

      Since Mangal’s video, many other creators have claimed that ANI pressured them into paying hefty licensing fees, or risk takedowns.

      Are Monetised Videos Fair Use?

      The ANI vs Mohal Mangal case has put under spotlight an important question of whether earning money from a video containing snippets from published news videos is disqualification against fair use.

      Advocate Aditya Gupta, Partner at Ira Law, argues that monetisation does not automatically make it unfair usage.

      “The whole point of fair dealing is that some uses—especially critical or educational—can’t be tightly controlled by copyright holders,” Gupta says. He adds that while each case needs to withstand court scrutiny, small clips, such as 2 to 11 seconds, used within news commentary, are likely to be protected.

      Gaining scrutiny in this debate is YouTube’s own policy governing videos published on the platform, which dictates that upon a valid copyright removal request, they must take down the video.

      Three strikes against one channel, leads to permanent deletion from YouTube.

      Navya Mall, a doctoral researcher at Delhi University focusing on AI and copyright, opines that Indian laws are disconnected and platforms ignore nuances. Using a 2012 Delhi High Court ruling that recognised short, transformative uses as fair dealing to highlight her point, Mall says there is an urgent need to redefine fair dealing in India’s copyright law, including explicit benchmarks such as a 15-second cap for non-commercial critique and a mandatory review of context before issuing strikes. This she says will guarantee better safeguards for digital creators, while not ignoring the rights holders; aligning with the evolving creative economy.

      Blurring Lines: YouTubers The New Journalists?

      The mushrooming of digital creators covering news, politics and current social issues is challenging the traditional definition of content in India. ANI vs Mohak Mangal makes clear the blurred lines between journalism, commentary and general content creation. Advocate Mall cites videos made by Dhruv Rathee or Film Companion which uses existing videos snippets under the guise of critique or public interest to highlight the same.

      “While this resembles traditional journalism or editorial commentary, it is often monetised and algorithm-driven, raising complex copyright questions,” says Mall, adding Instagram reels, X threads and any content that remixes published news, film scenes, or memes for socio-political commentary in to the same grey bucket of part journalism, part entertainment.

      “Such hybrid content does not fit neatly into existing legal categories, which is why our fair dealing framework under Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957 needs to evolve to address this convergence,” Mall says proposing reforms such as:

      • A 15-second cap for non-commercial critique
      • Mandatory context review before issuing copyright strikes

      Has This Happened Before?

      Yes, in 2021, India Today sued Newslaundry over copyright infringement and defamation. On the issue, the Delhi High Court ruled that commentary on how news is reported could qualify as fair use— still continuing to stress that each case must be evaluated on intent and context.

      In the U.S., the Google Books case saw courts eventually rule that scanning books and showing snippets from the same was fair use due to its transformative nature, even though copyright holders initially won the case.

      The Bigger Picture

      The ANI vs Mohak Mangal case has opened a pertinent chapter in India's evolving content economy with both creators and rights holders expressing valid concerns. Experts remain of the opinion that the current legal tools need a refresher and reframing of vague rules, incapable of dealing with digital-age conflicts.

      As the courts hear ANI and Mangal and deliberate, the case is likely to be a benchmark for future copyright battles—not just between media houses and YouTubers, but also challenging use and generation of content by AI platforms, streaming services, and traditional publishers.

      The lack of nuance in automated systems, combined with unclear Indian law, has left creators battling an environment where the lack of due process is punishment.

      Tags

      Copyright ActANIYoutuber
      Read Full Article
      Next Story
      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Please reload after ad blocker is disabled.
      X

      Subscribe to BOOM Newsletters

      👉 No spam, no paywall — but verified insights.

      Please enter a Email Address
      Subscribe for free!

      Stay Ahead of Misinformation!

      Please enter a Email Address
      Subscribe Now🛡️ 100% Privacy Protected | No Spam, Just Facts
      By subscribing, you agree with the Terms & conditions and Privacy Policy connected to the offer

      Thank you for subscribing!

      You’re now part of the BOOM community.

      Or, Subscribe to receive latest news via email
      Subscribed Successfully...
      Copy HTMLHTML is copied!
      There's no data to copy!