Is Coronavirus A Bioweapon? The Internet Loves To Think So

Conspiracy theories around the pandemic being caused by a bioweapon has filled the internet, ever since it began.

The COVID-19 outbreak has seen a barrage of misinformation around the virus, the disease and potential cures and vaccines. But a particularly tenacious rumour has consistently found its way back in the cyberspace, despite being repeatedly debunked by fact checkers.

The rumour states that the current pandemic is caused by a bioweapon, made by humans in a lab. It has appeared in various iterations, in the form of different stories - sometimes entirely fictional, sometimes inspired by real life events.

This article is meant to bring together such stories, look at its origins, and explain why existing scientific evidence rubbishes the bioweapon theory.

Conspiracy Theories, Rumours And False Predictions

1. The Reddit Thread That Got Out Of Hand

Around March, a story appeared on social media, claiming that the recent outbreak of the novel Coronavirus was concocted to hide the spread of a bioweapon, that was accidentally released near Wuhan's wild animal market.

The story was seemingly written from the point of view of a high-ranking Chinese intelligence officer, who explains how the virus was initially developed to suppress the Hong Kong protests, and was later leaked at the market when a "traitor" tried to sell it to the United States.

Also Read: False: Chinese Intelligence Officer Reveals Coronavirus Is A Bioweapon

Our investigation revealed that this story has no link to reality, and that it originated from a subreddit called r/NoSleep - a Reddit forum where people share fictional horror stories often based on real events. A user, named as Wuhanvirusthrowaway published the fictional story in the Reddit forum.

Despite being debunked, Marathi daily Lokmat published this work of fiction on its English web edition as a real story.

2. The Netflix Show That Predicted The Outbreak

A prediction theory came up, when netizens started sharing a segment from Netflix Korean drama My Secret Terrius, where the characters discussed the outbreak of a new human-made coronavirus bioweapon.

Also Read: Did A Netflix Show Predict The COVID-19 Outbreak?

However, the prediction theory did not hold our scrutiny. We found that the properties of the virus discussed in the episode do not match those of SARS-CoV-2 - the causative agent behind COVID-19.

3. The Harvard Professor Who Did Not Invent Coronavirus

Social media saw a revival of the bioweapon theory, when a Harvard chemist Dr. Charles Lieber, was arrested by the United States Department of Justice for dubious links with the Chinese government. Facebook posts and WhatsApp forwards started claiming that Lieber was arrested for manufacturing the new coronavirus for China.

Also Read: False: Harvard Professor Arrested For Manufacturing Novel Coronavirus

Dr. Lieber was indeed arrested for allegedly making a false statement about his involvement with the Chinese government, and for alleged non-disclosure of Chinese funding. However, the viral claims are misleading - a quick look through the press statement by the US Department of Justice reveals that the entire fiasco has nothing to do with the ongoing pandemic.

Lawsuits, Chinese Rumours And Affinity For Conspiracies

The theories around COVID-19 being caused by a bioweapon is not limited to social media. A $20 trillion lawsuit was filed against China in March in a Texas District Court for the "creation and release, accidental or otherwise" of the new virus causing COVID-19.

"COVID-19 was designed by China to be a very 'effective' and catastrophic biological warfare weapon to kill mass populations… there are many indications besides the nature of the disease demonstrating that the virus was engineered in the Chinese military's laboratory or laboratories," the plaintiffs argued in the lawsuit.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported that the Chinese government is actively pushing the theory that the virus was released by the US Army during a visit to Wuhan last October.

Each of these instances have given strong credence to the bioweapon theory, making it likely for such rumours to appear again.

Furthermore, certain psychological traits play a big role in drawing people to such conspiracies. Karen M. Douglas, a social psychologist who studies belief in conspiracies at the University of Kent in Britain, told the New York Times that such conspiracies "satisfy certain psychological motives".

"If you believe in conspiracy theories, then you have power through knowledge that other people don't have," she said.

No Evidence, Says Science

Recent studies on SARS-CoV-2 provides us enough evidence to debunk the claim that the virus was human-made. Peer-reviewed articles (Zhou et. al (2020); Andersen et. al (2020)) state two possible theories for the origins of the virus:

  1. The virus went through natural selection in an animal (currently the progenitor host is theorised to be a bat or a pangolin), before going through zoonotic transfer (transfer of pathogens between animals and humans), and jumping into a human host.
  2. The virus jumped into a human host from an animal, while going through re-assortment of its genetic make-up that could lead it to acquiring the properties to start a pandemic.
The study by Andersen et. al (2020) states that their analysis of the virus shows no sign of human manipulation.

"The high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation," the paper stated.

"Furthermore, if genetic manipulation had been performed, one of the several reverse-genetic systems available for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone," it added.

If you value our work, we have an ask:

Our journalists work with TruthSeekers like you to publish fact-checks, explainers, ground reports and media literacy content. Much of this work involves using investigative methods and forensic tools. Our work is resource-intensive, and we rely on our readers to fund our work. Support us so we can continue our work of decluttering the information landscape.

📧 Subscribe to our newsletter here.

📣You can also follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, Linkedin and Google News
Show Full Article
Next Story
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Please reload after ad blocker is disabled.