Republic TV's Facebook Poll Backfires; Majority Say They Will Not Stand With Varnika Kundu

1583 people said NO - which means they will not stand with Varnika Kundu as compared to 1442 comments saying YES. But what was this poll hoping to achieve?

Screenshot of Republic's Facebook post

The rush to seek public opinion by news channels on a developing news story can often throw up unexpected results. Republic TV owned by Arnab Goswami today faced one such embarrassing moment when they ran a poll on Facebook asking their viewers to express if they stand with Varnika Kundu, who has accused Vikas Barala, son of Haryana state BJP President Subhash Barala of stalking and attempting to kidnap her. Barala was arrested today after being charged with trying to kidnap Kundu after relevant sections were added following public outrage over bail granted to him earlier this week.

Strangely, Republic TV who have covered the story non-stop over the last two days gave the options 'YES' or 'NO'. For a channel that was running a hashtag #IStandWithVarnika, Do You?, the results turned out to be rather shocking.

1583 people said NO - which means they will not stand with Varnika as compared to 1442 YES comments.

It was unclear why Republic decided to do such a poll. Did they find it difficult to believe the account of the victim and wanted to know if their viewers think the same? Or was it an effort to provoke its viewers and drive the debate as they move towards their prime time show in the evening in support of Varnika?

In the event that there were any doubts over her account, it was the job of Republic to investigate and find out the truth rather than leave it to the court of public opinion. If the poll was in Varnika's favour, Barala's legal team could have also make a contrary argument. Should news channels be allowed to run polls that call a person guilty when the case is subjudice?

Sensing the backlash that the post was generating on Facebook, the poll was deleted but not before we took a screenshot of the post. Look at the comments with the post and one can understand why there was such a backlash. Knowingly or unknowingly, Republic gave a platform to vile comments from those who wanted to normalise and generate a narrative that Varnika lied about the incident.

It is understandable that social media engagement is a valid form of promotion of the day's stories for any news channel. But by posting a poll in a case where allegations are being made about VVIP treatment being given to the son of a powerful poltician according to Republic's own stories, the channel also helped in the process of shaming the victim that is clearly evident from the comments posted on the poll.

Interestingly, at the time this poll was running on Facebook, the channel's editor Arnab Goswami was also interviewing Varnika Kundu and her father, praising them for the bold steps taken by them without fearing the high and the mighty.

Apart from the channel's irresponsible post on Facebook before it was deleted, the fact that more people chose the option 'NO' also came as a shock to many on the social media platform.

BOOM reached out to Republic TV on Twitter. We are still waiting for their response. We will update when we hear from Republic.

If you value our work, we have an ask:

Our journalists work with TruthSeekers like you to publish fact-checks, explainers, ground reports and media literacy content. Much of this work involves using investigative methods and forensic tools. Our work is resource-intensive, and we rely on our readers to fund our work. Support us so we can continue our work of decluttering the information landscape.

📧 Subscribe to our newsletter here.

📣You can also follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, Linkedin and Google News

📝Stay updated with all our latest fact check stories.
Show Full Article
Next Story
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Please reload after ad blocker is disabled.