English news channel NewsX held an hour-long debate last week speculating how Brenton Harrison Tarrant, the gunman at centre of mass shootings at two mosques in New Zealand which killed 50, could be a proxy for Pakistan, based on a Facebook post.
The 56-minute debate that aired on March 15, 2019, the day of the attack in Christchurch, began with the channel first showing a Facebook post from October 2018 that included a picture of Tarrant.
The Facebook post on the timeline of Syed Israr Hussain, a hotel owner in Pakistan, was first discovered by social media users and soon picked up by news outlets across the world. However, NewsX attributed the find to Australian news reports.
It showed the accused gunman, an Australian citizen by birth, had visited Pakistan as a tourist, last year.
The post believed to be written by him said, “Unfortunately many tourists are choosing other countries due to the stress, difficulty and steep requirements of obtaining a Pakistani visa.”
“Hopefully in the near future the Pakistani government and Mr Imran Khan will make the necessary changes to the visa program so to encourage tourism and make it viable once more for the world to come and experience the beauty of Pakistan.” – (An excerpt of the Facebook post)
While the Facebook post was proof that the gunman visited Pakistan in 2018, NewsX used speculation and conjecture to suggest Tarrant’s visit to the country was somehow linked to the attack.
The channel ran text graphics that read, ‘LONE GUNMAN OR PAK PROXY’, ”SMOKING GUN’ WAS ON FB’, ‘AUSSIE MEDIA NAILS LINK’ along with a reporter showing a map of Pakistan with the exact location of the hotel Tarrant stayed at.
BOOM sent a questionnaire to NewsX and will update the article if and when we receive a response.
NewsX’s Uday Pratap Singh claimed ‘a Pakistani terror link’ had been established. The discussion went as follows.
Devika Chopra (reporter): A Pakistani connection has now been established,
Uday Pratap Singh (anchor): Clearly
From here, the anchor opened up the discussion to panelists.
As the debate raged on several theories were put forward such as gunman being a sleeper cell of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), that the attack was to divert attention from Pulwama. Panelists even questioned the accused religion and raised doubts about a hate crime
Theory 1: “Diverting attention from Pulwama.”
Anchor (Uday): At the end of the day, it needs to be probed further, the shooting just took place about 12 hours ago, at the end of the day, you know a Pakistani link emerging Sir, your first reaction, sir, because you know Pakistan has emerged as the hotbed of terror, and it’s not India saying this now, the world is…
Panelist (Air Marshal Chopra): Assessing from a simple hate syndrome, somebody picking up a gun, I’m told he brought an AK-47 and did this job, to the extent of assessment that possibly diverting the attention of the world from Pakistan connected to Pulwama is quite a possible implication…
Theory 2: ‘Foreigner Radicalisation Angle’
Anchor (Uday): I want to come back to the foreigner radicalisation point, it’s happened before with David Hadley as Lt General Metha just mentioned, but there have been other foreigners who have been radicalised in Pakistan particularly haven’t they? That’s why this must be probed.
Theory 3: Pakistan-ISI Angle
Panelist (Commodore Sodhi): As far as this gentleman is concerned, this accused, they have to investigate what is his name? Is his religion
Anchor (Uday): So who were the others?
Theory 4: ‘Hate Crime (Motive) Doesn’t Add Up’
Panelist: See Uday, you spoke about the hate crime, so what is surprising is even if you take the aspect of hate crime, here is a person who has gone to Pakistan, who has been talking about parsing Pakistan, who praises the Pakistan Prime Minister, he does this act that too in a mosque, and the link to Pakistan, this hate crime aspect doesn’t add up.
Anchor: Hmm. It doesn’t add up, you’re right.
NewsX claimed the hotel owner’s name was ‘Ishar Osho Thang’, however ‘Osho Thang’ is the name of the resort in Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan.
The New York Times contacted Syed Israr Hussain, the owner of Osho Thang hotel in Minapin, Pakistan. Hussain told the newspaper that the accused had stayed there for two or three days with a group of backpackers.
Israr did not reply to BOOM’s messages when contacted on Facebook.
New York Times had reported that a person with the same name as the accused had stayed at two hotels during October in Pakistan.
Tarrant’s travels have come under scrutiny since the attacks. Besides Pakistan, he also traveled extensively to places such as Turkey, Bulgaria, North Korea, South East Asia and East Asia, none of which wasn’t emphasized during the NewsX’s debate.
The Washington Post reported that he had described his travels, positively, in his manifesto. However, it was the Stockholm attack in 2017 when an Uzbek asylum seeker rammed a truck into a departmental store killing five, that seemed to have hardened his views on immigration.
“In the manifesto, he described how it was on a trip to western Europe in 2017 that he first “dramatically changed” his views on immigration — an experience that appears to have led to his radicalization. On that trip, he traveled through France, Portugal, and elsewhere, he wrote, and was horrified by a truck attack in Stockholm around that time that left a young girl dead. ” – The Post reported.
The accused gunman’s manifesto
The posted a 74-page manifesto online before carrying out the attack.
“In the document, called “the great replacement”, Tarrant describes himself as a “regular white man from a regular family” who “decided to take a stand to ensure a future for my people”, The Guardian reported. “He said he wanted his attack on the mosques to send a message that “nowhere in the world is safe”.
Right-wing extremism a motive
Several news reports pointed towards white supremacy and right-wing extremism as the motive behind the attacks.
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison called it a “violent, extremist, right-wing extremism attack.”