Support

Explore

HomeNo Image is Available
About UsNo Image is Available
AuthorsNo Image is Available
TeamNo Image is Available
CareersNo Image is Available
InternshipNo Image is Available
Contact UsNo Image is Available
MethodologyNo Image is Available
Correction PolicyNo Image is Available
Non-Partnership PolicyNo Image is Available
Cookie PolicyNo Image is Available
Grievance RedressalNo Image is Available
Republishing GuidelinesNo Image is Available

Languages & Countries :






More about them

Fact CheckNo Image is Available
LawNo Image is Available
ExplainersNo Image is Available
NewsNo Image is Available
DecodeNo Image is Available
BOOM ReportsNo Image is Available
Media BuddhiNo Image is Available
Web StoriesNo Image is Available
BOOM ResearchNo Image is Available
WorkshopsNo Image is Available
VideosNo Image is Available

Support

Explore

HomeNo Image is Available
About UsNo Image is Available
AuthorsNo Image is Available
TeamNo Image is Available
CareersNo Image is Available
InternshipNo Image is Available
Contact UsNo Image is Available
MethodologyNo Image is Available
Correction PolicyNo Image is Available
Non-Partnership PolicyNo Image is Available
Cookie PolicyNo Image is Available
Grievance RedressalNo Image is Available
Republishing GuidelinesNo Image is Available

Languages & Countries :






More about them

Fact CheckNo Image is Available
LawNo Image is Available
ExplainersNo Image is Available
NewsNo Image is Available
DecodeNo Image is Available
BOOM ReportsNo Image is Available
Media BuddhiNo Image is Available
Web StoriesNo Image is Available
BOOM ResearchNo Image is Available
WorkshopsNo Image is Available
VideosNo Image is Available
Law

Maharashtra Governor Wrong, But Cannot Restore Uddhav Thackeray Govt: SC

Supreme Court verdict came on a batch of cross-appeals seeking ownership of the party name and symbol.

By - Ritika Jain | 11 May 2023 7:38 AM GMT

Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench unanimously pointed out that it could not restore Uddhav Thackeray’s government even though Maharashtra Governor Bhagat Singh Koshiyari’s call for a floor test was “illegal” and “unjustified”.

The bench said Thackeray resigned instead of facing a floor test. “Cannot quash a resignation that was voluntarily given,” the Supreme Court said.

The bench said Speaker Rahul Narwekar’s decision to recognize Bharat Gogawale as chief whip of the Shiv Sena Legislative Party the rebel faction led by Eknath Shinde “is illegal”.

“The Speaker did not attempt to identify which of the two persons – Sunil Prabhu or Gogawale, was the whip authorised by the political party. The Speaker must recognise only the whip that is appointed by the political party,” the bench said.

SC said MLAs were simply expressing their dissatisfaction with the party. A floor test cannot be resolved to judge discontent within a party, the bench said. The Governor was not empowered to enter the political arena on inter-party disputes or intra-party disputes, it added.

Supreme Court’s observation is a scathing indictment of the Governor, the Speaker, and incumbent CM Eknath Shine who broke away from the Shiv Sena with 38 rebel MLAs to stake claim for the government triggering the Maharashtra political crisis and downfall of Thackeray’s government.  


Full View


Also Read: After SC Allows Floor Test, Uddhav Thackeray Resigns as Maharashtra CM

The verdict was given on a batch of cross-appeals pleas filed by ex-Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray and incumbent CM Eknath Shinde seeking ownership of the party name and symbol.

Last year in June, Shine had challenged the then Deputy Speaker’s disqualification notice to the Shiv Sena rebels under the 10th schedule, while Thackeray challenged Maharashtra Governor Bhagat Singh Koshiyari’s decision to call for a trust vote.

In August 2022, the bench led by then-Chief Justice NV Ramana referred the plea to a Constitution Bench and framed 11 questions for consideration.