The India-China Conflict refers to the ongoing geopolitical and border disputes between India and China, primarily focused along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which serves as the de facto border between the two countries. The conflict is marked by historical tensions, competing territorial claims, and military standoffs that date back to the Sino-Indian War of 1962, when China seized control of the Aksai Chin region, a territory claimed by India.

The border disputes have persisted for decades, with skirmishes and stand-offs occurring intermittently. Key areas of tension include Ladakh in the western sector, Sikkim in the middle sector, and Arunachal Pradesh in the eastern sector. In recent years, tensions have escalated, particularly with the Doklam standoff in 2017 and the violent clashes in the Galwan Valley in June 2020, resulting in casualties on both sides. The Galwan clash marked the first deadly confrontation between the two nations in over 45 years, leading to heightened military deployments along the border.

Diplomatic talks, including the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) and Corps Commander-level meetings, have been conducted to de-escalate tensions, with mixed outcomes. Both countries have also sought to maintain a balance between diplomatic engagement and military preparedness. Despite multiple rounds of negotiations, the situation remains volatile, with continued infrastructure development, patrolling, and military fortification along the LAC.

The India-China conflict has also been a hotspot for misinformation, with social media often becoming a platform for spreading misleading narratives about military actions, territorial claims, and diplomatic developments. Fact-checking organizations play a crucial role in verifying claims and maintaining accurate information flow about the conflict.

In June 2020, BOOM fact-checked a viral tweet that purported to show official statements about the Ladakh standoff.

BOOM found several anomalies in the tweet screenshot, confirming that it was morphed and did not represent an official statement, debunking the misleading narrative related to the conflict.